The Provost Reported the President’s Husband for Harassment. Now It’s Complicated.


Now he’d actually finished it.

Round 4 a.m. on April 16, Patrick McCallum, a higher-education lobbyist and the husband of Judy Ok. Sakaki, president of Sonoma State College, fired off an electronic mail to relations and associates. Days earlier, the Los Angeles Instances reported that the California State College system, which incorporates Sonoma amongst its 23 campuses, had paid $600,000 to settle a declare with Sonoma’s former provost, who stated that Sakaki had retaliated in opposition to her for reporting harassment allegations in opposition to McCallum. The revelation thrust Sakaki into a bigger controversy at Cal State, which has been beneath regular criticism of late for its dealing with of sexual-harassment allegations.

For days, McCallum had been in a veritable bunker, saying little concerning the fees introduced by three girls, who stated that he had stood too shut, run his fingers via a lady’s hair, and usually been “creepy,” “disgusting,” and “pervy,” the Instances reported. McCallum denied that he had harassed anybody, however stated in a statement that he was “deeply sorry that my phrases and actions harm folks, have been perceived as disrespectful, and made some uncomfortable.”

The optics weren’t good. McCallum and Sakaki had, in January, signed an agreement with Lisa Vollendorf, the previous provost, hoping to quietly shut the e book on what had been a tumultuous partnership between the president and her erstwhile No. 2. Neither aspect, beneath the settlement, had admitted any wrongdoing. However McCallum knew that he and his spouse have been shedding the battle within the courtroom of public opinion, he instructed The Chronicle in interviews over latest days. Dropping? They weren’t even preventing, he surmised.

By this time, Sakaki had assembled her personal disaster cupboard, together with a lawyer and a public-relations specialist. Everybody was telling McCallum to maintain his mouth shut. Couldn’t he inform his aspect of the story to a couple family and friends members? Positive, the lawyer stated. However nobody envisioned that McCallum would write a rambling, 1,200-word, error-laden screed and electronic mail it to fifteen folks.

Patrick McCallum

Courtesy of Patrick McCallum

Patrick McCallum

McCallum’s email laid out a special story than what folks had learn within the newspapers. As president, Sakaki had frequently fielded complaints about Vollendorf, whom folks on campus described as abrasive, retaliatory, and disrespectful of others’ opinions, McCallum wrote. Just some months after Vollendorf began at Sonoma State, Sakaki had stated the provost was “the worst rent of her profession,” McCallum wrote. “Even the chair of the accreditation go to instructed Judy she had an issue with Lisa and will fireplace her,” McCallum instructed his confidants. The implication was clear: Vollendorf hadn’t been pushed out of the job by a retaliatory president, as she had claimed; she was unhealthy information from the soar, and the fees in opposition to McCallum had been designed to “get Judy fired.”

Vollendorf didn’t reply to an interview request. Her lawyer, Pamela M. Sayad, stated, “The settlement settlement actually speaks for itself. You don’t pay that type of cash, and all of the people concerned don’t signal it, if there wasn’t misconduct or wrongdoing, which there was.”

About half-hour after McCallum despatched off the e-mail, he forwarded it to his spouse, her lawyer, and her communications specialist. Nobody was pleased. The e-mail was doubtlessly defamatory. To the extent that it presupposed to share Sakaki’s personal musings together with her husband, it might implicate the president, too. Inside a day, The Press Democrat, a newspaper in Santa Rosa, Calif., had gotten maintain of the e-mail and published it in full.

That night, Sakaki talked about the prospect of a marital separation, McCallum stated. “Judy’s lawyer stated to her, ‘If you wish to preserve your job, you’re going to need to deny and separate,’” McCallum stated. The subsequent morning, Sakaki confirmed her husband a draft assertion saying the couple’s separation, he stated.

“She stated, ‘It is a assertion I’m making to the school,’” McCallum stated. “I requested her to edit it, and she or he made one little, small edit. However she wouldn’t take my edits. And I stated, ‘You’re making a mistake; this isn’t going that can assist you.’ She says, ‘No, I believe it is going to, and I want time. I want time to heal, and separation.’ After which it made me offended that folks have been going to place me beneath the bus.”

I made the choice to separate as a result of our relationship had turn into poisonous, and I might not stay with him.

In a management disaster that blends indistinguishably the non-public {and professional}, this second, as instructed by McCallum, stands out as notably illustrative. A college president, beneath fireplace for the way she responded to harassment allegations in opposition to her partner, gave her husband an advance peek at a press launch saying their separation; and that’s how her husband stated he came upon it was truly taking place.

“I learn it, and I’m going, ‘Holy shit, she’s severe,’” McCallum stated. “She confirmed it to me, and I used to be shocked, and actually, actually, actually harm. And I requested her to not do it, and she or he stated, ‘No, I’m doing this, and I want time.’”

Sakaki declined an interview request. Her spokesman, nevertheless, supplied The Chronicle with an announcement from Sakaki about McCallum’s characterizations of their separation. “What Patrick is saying is solely not true,” the assertion says. “I made the choice to separate as a result of our relationship had turn into poisonous, and I might not stay with him.”

On April 18 the president issued a statement saying the couple’s separation. “These previous few days have been extraordinarily tough,” the assertion started. “I’m now confronted with a problem that I by no means thought I would wish to confront: disavowing the phrases and actions of my husband, Patrick McCallum.” Sakaki stated McCallum’s electronic mail to family and friends members was “inaccurate and unauthorized.” She had “made the tough private choice to separate from Patrick.”

“I had approached this matter as if he and I have been on the identical group, with comparable pursuits,” Sakaki wrote, “however it’s clear to me that that is not the case.”

Before all of this, there was only one story about McCallum and Sakaki that everybody at Sonoma State in all probability knew. Within the predawn hours of October 9, 2017, a couple of yr into her presidency, Sakaki ran screaming via the couple’s Santa Rosa dwelling. “‘We’ve to get out this second!’” McCallum recalled her saying. Fleeing the home barefoot — McCallum in boxer shorts and Sakaki in a gown — they ran outdoors into an apocalyptic inferno. Wildfires burned for miles in each route. If not for a Santa Rosa firefighter, whom the couple noticed taking his closing move via their neighborhood, the 2 in all probability would have perished.

“We’ve one another — that’s a very powerful half,” McCallum later told the San Francisco Chronicle. “We’re mad in love with one another already, however an expertise like this even makes us nearer.”

The story of the couple’s harrowing escape is branded within the campus’s collective reminiscence. The Tubbs Fireplace, which demolished their dwelling, raged throughout California’s Wine Nation that fall, destroying 5,600 buildings and killing 22 folks. For Sakaki, it was a second of personal trauma that grew to become an necessary a part of her public identification. It linked her in a visceral strategy to a regional catastrophe that may usher in additional issues for the college. Many have blamed the fires for Sonoma State’s declining enrollment, an issue that may be exacerbated, years later, by the pandemic. On a extra private stage, observers stated, the hearth appeared to vary Sakaki profoundly.

In her first yr, Sakaki was considered as a frontrunner of nice promise, filling out her cupboard with new folks and specializing in the recruitment of extra various college students. She pivoted away from what some perceived to be the “nation membership” picture of Sonoma State that had been cultivated by her long-serving predecessor. The brand new president had a strong story, too. She is the primary Japanese American lady to guide a four-year public college in america. Sakaki’s dad and mom were confined to an internment camp throughout World Struggle II, and she or he is a first-generation school graduate. A product of the Cal State system, Sakaki earned bachelor’s and grasp’s levels from the East Bay campus, in human improvement and academic psychology, respectively. She holds a doctorate in schooling from the College of California at Berkeley.

After the hearth, although, Sakaki appeared to many to shift her focus away from campus and towards rebuilding her life. This was comprehensible, however not with out consequence. “That created one thing of an influence vacuum, as a result of the president was simply not there,” stated Laura A. Watt, who served as school chair from 2018 to 2020. “And the provost fortunately moved proper into that.”

Vollendorf’s tenure at Sonoma State started in July 2017, about three months earlier than the hearth destroyed Sakaki’s dwelling. There was some expectation on campus that Vollendorf, who had beforehand been dean of San Jose State’s School of Humanities and the Arts, would offer an instructional stability to Sakaki, whose administrative background was in scholar affairs. “She was clearly going to be a really robust provost,” Watt stated, “very forceful.” Sakaki, against this, was identified to “lead from behind,” Watt stated, and appeared at occasions virtually too involved with preserving a “group” atmosphere.

Traditionally, Sonoma State’s school chair held common one-on-one conferences with the president and the provost, Watt stated. However when Watt’s tenure as chair started, within the fall of 2018, Vollendorf instructed her that “we’ve determined” that the provost and president would meet collectively with the chair. Watt stated she was uncomfortable with the change, as a result of it meant that the provost — “the boss of the school” — would at all times be listening when the school chair had an viewers with the president.

The shifting energy dynamics at Sonoma State have been additional difficult by the ambiguous position of Sakaki’s husband. Formally McCallum was a “volunteer,” however he knew simply sufficient to drive folks loopy. Collaborative Mind Belief, an organization McCallum based, had developed a whole bunch of strategic plans for faculties. Given his background, McCallum “provided” to assist Vollendorf with a brand new strategic plan, he stated in his electronic mail final month to relations and associates. However Vollendorf responded “angrily,” McCallum wrote, and instructed him, “I don’t want your assist.”

I’m extra educated about greatest practices, for scholar success, accreditation, strategic planning, and training than in all probability 99 % of spouses.

“I’m extra educated about greatest practices, for scholar success, accreditation, strategic planning, and training than in all probability 99 % of spouses,” McCallum stated in an interview. “And having an excessive amount of information on this case might be an issue.”

For all of his expertise in larger schooling, McCallum stated, he had no “handbook” for being a school president’s husband. He had realized to carry his tongue, he stated, partly at Sakaki’s urging. She had instructed him that he was too trusting of individuals and that this might create hassle.

In some unspecified time in the future, McCallum attended a workshop for presidential spouses hosted by the American Affiliation of State Schools and Universities, which he discovered useful. However, on at the least one event, he “blew it,” McCallum stated. He had expertise as a fund raiser and fancied himself fairly good at it. Pondering he may very well be of assist, McCallum supplied “20 completely different” fund-raising or grant results in Gordon McDougall, then the college’s director of development.

“He didn’t reply to considered one of them,” McCallum stated, “and I blew up at him: ‘I’m not paid; you’re paid. I’ve given you 20 leads. You didn’t comply with up with considered one of them, Gordon? I imply, what are you doing?’”

In hindsight, McCallum stated, he was out of line. “That’s not the position of a partner, and I made a mistake. I used to be correct, however I ought to have by no means stated it.”

McDougall, who stepped down in 2020, declined an interview request. However he instructed the Instances that he had shielded girls on his group from McCallum as a result of “there have been complaints of inappropriate touching and feedback,” and that McCallum had made girls “uncomfortable.”

McDougall as soon as noticed McCallum behaving in what appeared like a very acquainted means with Vollendorf, he told The Press Democrat. In September 2018, throughout an occasion on the campus’s Inexperienced Music Middle, McDougall stated he witnessed McCallum brushing Vollendorf’s hair away from her face. “I wouldn’t try this with too many ladies that I do know apart from my spouse,” McDougall instructed the newspaper. (McCallum denies brushing anybody’s hair, together with Sakaki’s.)

To listen to McCallum inform it, his missteps as a presidential partner gave Sakaki’s critics the ammunition they wanted. “It pissed him off,” McCallum stated about shedding his cool with McDougall over the fund-raising leads. “He was already in one of many camps in opposition to Judy. He was already there. However after I did that, it actually pissed him off.”

McCallum is true about one factor. He undoubtedly pissed folks off.

By 2018, temperatures have been working excessive at Sonoma State. A few yr after the Tubbs Fireplace, the Camp Fireplace broke out within the Sierra Nevada foothills, cloaking the Sonoma State campus in smoke. The college felt at warfare with the pure atmosphere, and there was debate and disagreement about find out how to successfully function a campus in a area that teetered between states of emergency.

Throughout a November 2018 assembly of the college’s government committee, of which the president and provost are members, a student-government consultant pressed Vollendorf for higher readability on how the college responded to wildfires. What concerns have been weighed in deciding whether or not to stay open or to shut? May college students be extra concerned in making the choice when an emergency arose?

Vollendorf grew to become defensive, snapping on the scholar, in accordance with three individuals who attended the assembly. “She undoubtedly raised her voice, however I wouldn’t say she was yelling,” the coed, who requested to not be recognized, wrote in an electronic mail to The Chronicle. “General she was dismissive to all of my questions. She was clearly pissed off with the entire state of affairs however was general impolite.” The scholar stated that he and others there had “felt her response was unprofessional.” (Sakaki was not current.)

Watt, the school chair, was disturbed by the alternate. It was one factor to tangle with a colleague, however this was a scholar. A line had been crossed. “My mouth was on the ground,” stated Watt, who retired final June and now lives in Iceland. “My God, I can’t imagine that is taking place.” Watt contacted Sakaki.

Judy Sakaki

Courtesy of Sonoma State U.

Judy Sakaki

“I stated, ‘The three of us want to fulfill and speak about this, as a result of this isn’t tolerable,’” Watt stated. “‘You possibly can’t deal with folks this manner.’” The three met on November 21, 2018, the day earlier than Thanksgiving, Watt’s information mirror. Watt stated she has little reminiscence of the assembly, apart from that it was uncomfortable. However “there was little or no change by way of the provost’s angle or habits,” Watt stated.

Shortly thereafter, in December 2018, Vollendorf reported three girls’s harassment allegations in opposition to McCallum to the chancellor’s workplace. Earlier than doing so, she consulted with Joyce Lopes, who, as Sonoma State’s vice chairman for administration and finance, oversaw threat and Title IX. Lopes, who has since left Sonoma State, suggested Vollendorf to ahead the knowledge to system officers somewhat than to the campus’s Title IX workplace. “The rationale was: Ship it to the chancellor’s workplace, the place there’s a separation, the place there isn’t the ability differential.”

The complaints, as described by information obtained by the Los Angeles Instances, alleged that McCallum had talked about his intercourse life, that he was “persistently flirtatious,” and that he had grabbed an worker “by the arm so she was compelled to remain near him,” the newspaper reported. Looming over all of these considerations was one other elementary query about McCallum’s position and his spouse’s judgment: Why was the president’s husband up in everybody’s enterprise, and why was Sakaki permitting it?

One of many complainants, who requested to not be recognized, instructed The Chronicle, “This man is perpetually in my workspace. No different business does this. It’s bizarre. It’s problematic.”

McCallum, who’s 68 years previous, noticed it otherwise. He’s a gregarious particular person, he stated, and he stands near folks as a result of he has been deaf in his left ear since delivery. He described himself as one thing of an avuncular presence on campus, chatting folks up about areas of mutual curiosity.

A type of areas of curiosity is artwork. Earlier than the hearth destroyed McCallum and Sakaki’s dwelling, in 2017, the couple had embellished it with art work from a set of about 450 acrylic, mixed-media, and watercolor photographs that had been donated to the college by the Benziger household. When the home burned down, practically $85,000 of that artwork went up in smoke, the Instances reported. It wasn’t lengthy, although, earlier than McCallum requested an worker if the couple’s new dwelling may very well be embellished with extra art work from the gathering. When the worker resisted, McCallum pushed again, suggesting that the choice be taken “to the cupboard,” the college’s management group.

I sleep with the top of the cupboard, so I principally am on the cupboard and get a vote.

Based on the Instances, citing information related to he case, a prime college official stated she had overheard McCallum telling two girls on the workers, “I sleep with the top of the cupboard, so I principally am on the cupboard and get a vote, and I vote for the artwork,” the newspaper reported. McCallum denied having stated that, however admitted he had been “pushy.” McCallum’s alleged remark about sleeping with the top of the cupboard was talked about within the allegations Vollendorf reported to the chancellor’s workplace. The provost, in accordance with the newspaper, reported that workers members had “discovered Mr. McCallum’s statements connecting intercourse, energy, and affect to be offensive and disturbing.”

(The Chronicle has reviewed public information related to the case, which California State supplied, however not the extra paperwork the Instances reported on.)

It was months after Vollendorf reported the allegations that McCallum and Sakaki realized that complaints about him had reached the chancellor’s workplace, McCallum stated. In April 2019, Timothy P. White, who was then the chancellor, and a system lawyer contacted Sakaki to debate McCallum’s habits, system officers stated. By this time, in accordance with an announcement by Cal State officers, the system’s Title IX compliance officer had decided that McCallum’s alleged habits may not rise to the extent of sexual harassment beneath college coverage. Moreover, the complainants had “made clear that they didn’t need to take part in a proper investigation,” the assertion stated. The chancellor, following the compliance officer’s advice, determined to “talk about the studies with the president and her partner in order that the considerations may very well be addressed promptly and with out additional involvement of the people,” system officers stated.

McCallum was not within the assembly with White, however stated Sakaki instructed him about it at dinner that evening. The chancellor didn’t determine the complainants, McCallum stated. Nonetheless, Sakaki and her husband instantly suspected Vollendorf’s involvement, he stated. Discussions have been already underway about changing the provost, McCallum stated. However White had instructed Sakaki to carry off on firing her, McCallum stated. Based on McCallum, White stated, “‘By the best way, your motion on Lisa is gonna need to cease.’”

It was “straightforward to determine at that time” that Vollendorf was concerned within the grievance, McCallum stated. “We have been 90 % certain she was the particular person.”

The couple’s early suspicion of Vollendorf’s position, which has not been beforehand reported, calls into query the core of Sakaki’s public protection in opposition to allegations that she retaliated in opposition to Vollendorf for reporting her husband. In a speech to the Tutorial Senate late final month, Sakaki stated that it will have been not possible for her to retaliate in opposition to anybody as a result of she was “not knowledgeable about any allegations” till “one yr” after the allegations have been made, which might imply she realized of them round December 2019. (Vollendorf and Sakaki had signed an agreement on November 22, 2019, that set out a timeline for the provost’s resignation.)

“Figuring out the timing of occasions,” Sakaki instructed the Senate, “ought to clarify that I used to be in no place to retaliate in opposition to anybody. Nor would I, even when I might.”

Cal State officers confirmed that “President Sakaki was knowledgeable of the allegations” by White in April 2019 — months earlier than Vollendorf signed the settlement to resign. Sakaki’s private spokesman, nevertheless, pushed again forcefully in opposition to the notion that Sakaki had realized of the allegations then. “That is false and we actually dispute it,” Larry Kamer, the spokesman, wrote in an underlined electronic mail. “The chancellor’s workplace didn’t present particular details about particular person allegations or complaining events in that assembly.” (Nothing in Sakaki’s assertion to the Senate advised such granularity. She stated she didn’t know concerning the allegations in any respect for a yr.)

Unstated in Sakaki’s public protection is the argument, as superior by her husband, that the president and provost had had a tough working relationship just about from the beginning. The existence of tensions between the 2, nevertheless, doesn’t negate the potential of retaliation. “There’s by no means any excellent supervisor relationship with an worker,” stated Sayad, Vollendorf’s lawyer. “There at all times are points, however there was nothing important that pulled these folks aside till after Sakaki was notified about my shopper’s complaints about her husband.”

Based on Vollendorf’s claim, Sakaki instantly “started a marketing campaign of retaliation” after she spoke with the chancellor in April 2019. She demanded that Vollendorf bear teaching and restricted the scope of the provost’s duties, in accordance with the declare. Lopes, the previous vice chairman, instructed The Chronicle that she had noticed firsthand what seemed to be a change in Sakaki’s therapy of Vollendorf. Lopes “seen Judy began going round Dr. Vollendorf,” she stated in an electronic mail, “assembly straight with Lisa’s direct studies, not together with her in conferences, taking obligations away from her, after which deciding that she simply couldn’t work with Lisa in any respect. This was a pronounced distinction from how she had labored with Dr. Vollendorf prior to now.”

Below their settlement of 2019, Vollendorf had stated she would step down as provost no later than June 30, 2020, which she did. Sakaki had agreed to function a optimistic reference for Vollendorf. Each had agreed to not disparage one another and to explain each other’s work in a “respectful, optimistic, {and professional}” method. However Sakaki didn’t stay as much as her finish of the discount, in accordance with Vollendorf’s declare. On February 1, 2021, “concrete proof emerged,” Vollendorf claimed, that Sakaki had defamed her and interfered together with her job prospects. (Sayad stated that Sakaki had violated the settlement in a dialog with a recruiter.)

Kamer, in an electronic mail to The Chronicle, stated, “Dr. Sakaki didn’t retaliate in opposition to Dr. Vollendorf. This matter was investigated by CSU. These have been the findings.” Michael Uhlenkamp, a spokesman for Cal State, echoed the sentiment. “The CSU denies that any acts of retaliation occurred,” he wrote in an electronic mail to The Chronicle.

“Do this for Judy.” That was a chorus McCallum typically heard, and so it was this previous winter, when Cal State attorneys instructed him to hitch his spouse in signing a authorized settlement with Vollendorf that launched the couple and Cal State from any doable future claims she may make. Below the phrases of the settlement, the previous provost would obtain a verify for $500,000. Her lawyer could be paid $100,000. “All people instructed Judy, ‘Settle, settle, settle, settle,’” McCallum stated. “I stated, ‘In the event you accept $500,000, that’s going to get leaked out. How are you going to clarify that you just by no means retaliated?’”

Because it turned out, it will be tougher to clarify than anybody totally understood on the time. In February, 5 weeks after McCallum and Sakaki signed the settlement, Joseph I. Castro, who had succeeded White as chancellor, resigned beneath criticism of his handling of a separate sexual-misconduct declare from years earlier. Throughout his tenure at Cal State-Fresno, the place Castro had been president, he agreed to provide a plum payout and a glowing reference to an administrator who had been discovered answerable for bullying and sexual harassment. There was a rising public consensus that Cal State had an issue with its dealing with of misconduct, which set the desk for the Sonoma State story to be much more explosive than it’d in any other case have been.

When the information broke of the Vollendorf settlement, Sakaki seemed to be doubtlessly complicit in a seedy system of backroom offers, this one involving her personal husband’s transgressions. Nothing may very well be farther from the reality, she would inform the Senate.

“It continues to disappoint me,” she stated, “that the exact same individuals who accuse me of wanting the opposite means or protecting up unhealthy acts have apparently given no thought to how deeply offensive I discover this habits, as a result of I’ve skilled it firsthand.”

To make sure, the president has her supporters, and a few professors detect racial and gender bias within the assaults which have come her means. However Sakaki was already on shaky floor with some school members, who’ve criticized her for price range issues and enrollment declines, amongst different points. Final week the Senate handed a vote of no confidence in her management, and a few state lawmakers are calling for her to resign.

As for Vollendorf, the previous Sonoma State provost is slated in July to imagine the presidency of the State College of New York’s Empire State School.

The fallout for McCallum has been swift and extreme. He lost a lobbying job with a belief that was created to compensate victims of California wildfires. He’s “off the record,” he stated, of a climate-change group he had hoped to hitch. Lots of his male associates have minimize off communication with him, though McCallum stated he finds it “attention-grabbing” that feminine associates haven’t. Days after Sakaki introduced their separation, McCallum was injured in a hit-and-run accident on his strategy to Sacramento, the place he was in search of a spot to stay, he stated. Affected by a extreme concussion, he employed a craniosacral therapist for therapy. When the therapist learn an article concerning the harassment allegations, McCallum stated, she didn’t need to work with him anymore.

Largely, McCallum sees his story as a cautionary story. Presidential spouses want extra coaching to grasp their roles and outline their correct lanes, he stated. Many complaints, like these made in opposition to him, may very well be extra successfully resolved via a “restorative justice” method than via a Title IX investigation, McCallum stated. However that’s not what he thinks the complainants actually wished. “My sense is, they used me and Title IX to get at Judy, they usually have been profitable.”

Not too long ago, McCallum stated, he realized from Sakaki a couple of fourth lady whom he had made uncomfortable. He was troubled by this, he stated, as a result of she wasn’t “in any camp that I knew” that was out to fireplace Sakaki. “I do know that I by no means hugged her,” McCallum stated. “I do know that for a reality. However I in all probability requested questions that have been — the best way I requested the questions might need made her uncomfortable. Publicly there was an apology that I gave to the press, and I apologized to any lady I made uncomfortable; I used to be considering of her.”

Final week McCallum was on the Baja California peninsula, in Mexico, the place he participated in a workshop hosted by the Fashionable Elder Academy, which describes itself as “the world’s first midlife knowledge college.” He meditated, learn books, and stared on the ocean. He was in fairly a state, he stated, earlier than he arrived. A few weeks earlier, he had had a dream. In it, he stated, he was in courtroom, on trial for a horrible crime. “I’m saying, ‘I by no means did it. I by no means did it.’ And nobody stands up for me,” McCallum stated. “I get thrown in jail.

“I knew I did nothing incorrect,” he continued. “And nobody was stepping as much as defend me. And nobody would permit me to defend myself. And I used to be stupidly once more trusting them, and I shouldn’t have. Judy is true. Belief was my greatest mistake.”


Leave a Comment