Excelsior awards mainly help middle-income CUNY students


The Excelsior Scholarship program, which covers tuition for low- and middle-income college students at public faculties and universities in New York State, principally serves middle-income college students and fails to achieve most Metropolis College of New York college students who disproportionately come from low-income backgrounds, in keeping with a new report by the City Institute, a analysis group targeted on fairness and social mobility.

State coverage makers praised this system when it was based in 2017 as a groundbreaking mannequin for different states, whilst comparable free tuition initiatives, often called promise packages, proliferated throughout the nation. It was the primary statewide program to cowl tuition not solely at group faculties but additionally four-year universities.

This system additionally drew criticism early on from some greater ed leaders as a result of it focused middle-income college students. This system covers the rest of tuition not lined by need-based federal or state monetary help for college students attending State College of New York or Metropolis College of New York campuses and whose household family revenue doesn’t exceed $125,000.

The report describes Excelsior as saddling college students with “additional paperwork” and imposing stringent necessities that may stop low-income college students from accessing the help.

“As policymakers nationwide think about various fashions of free school, New York’s expertise with Excelsior highlights a broader rigidity: how a lot superb print is an excessive amount of in the case of free school?” the report asks.

College students are required to enroll full-time and full 30 course credit annually towards their levels to qualify for the scholarship. They’re additionally required to reside and work solely in New York for a similar variety of years they acquired the scholarships, and in the event that they transfer, the grants convert into no-interest loans that have to be paid again. For instance, if a pupil acquired scholarships for 4 years, however left New York three years later, that pupil owes the state one-fourth of the grant cash.

The report discovered that about 57 p.c of first-year Excelsior recipients in fall 2018 had a family revenue of $70,000 or greater, which is barely above New York Metropolis’s median revenue of $67,046, in keeping with U.S. Census Bureau data. Roughly 68 p.c of scholarship {dollars} went to college students at or above that revenue degree.

Morley Winograd, president of the Marketing campaign for Free Faculty Tuition, which advocates without spending a dime school packages, mentioned these outcomes are unsurprising on condition that Excelsior was supposed to give attention to middle-class households.

“The truth that folks with incomes at or above $70,000 are the principal recipients means this system is working,” he mentioned. “It’s not a flaw. It’s part of the design.”

Nonetheless, he additionally views Excelsior for instance of “how to not do it” in the case of designing promise packages. He agreed the method to acquire the award is simply too difficult, and the requirement that graduates stay in New York or pay again the cash is an particularly “unpopular provision” and main barrier for college students.

CJ Libassi, co-author of the report and a doctoral pupil at Columbia’s Academics Faculty, famous that whereas the scholarship’s necessities are supposed to encourage college students to remain enrolled, graduate and bolster the native labor market, college students having the cash they should pay for faculty can also be key to persistence.

“To the extent that these guidelines which are supposed to have incentive results on college students stop college students from getting cash within the first place … when you do the ultimate calculus, that may find yourself having detrimental results on college students’ enrollment and development,” he mentioned.

Most CUNY college students didn’t profit from the scholarship within the preliminary yr of this system. Solely 5 p.c of first-time, first-year undergraduates in fall 2018 acquired Excelsior grants, whereas 72 p.c acquired the Pell Grant, federal monetary help for low-income college students, and 57 p.c acquired state Tuition Help Program funds.

In the meantime, 1 / 4 of scholars eligible for the awards really acquired them, and the odds of recipients amongst eligible community college students and college students of coloration had been even decrease. Solely 8 p.c of eligible group school college students acquired an award, and eligible Black and Latino college students had been about 10 share factors much less more likely to obtain the scholarship relative to their friends. These college students had been additionally much less more likely to renew the scholarship for a second yr.

Eli Dvorkin, editorial and coverage director on the Middle for an City Future, a assume tank targeted on financial mobility in New York Metropolis, mentioned this system neglects the scholars who want it most. He mentioned state coverage makers may consider low-income college students have all their wants met by federal and state help, however, he famous, these college students battle with nontution prices and wish extra funding.

“Whereas it’s admirable that New York State is making an attempt to make a university training extra reasonably priced for a broad vary of New York households, specifically a bigger variety of middle-class households, the truth is these {dollars} are doing little to make a level attainable for our metropolis and state’s lowest-income school college students,” he mentioned. “And that’s an enormous drawback, as a result of these are the scholars who face the steepest limitations to incomes a university credential within the first place. New York actually must give attention to getting extra {dollars} out to low-income college students that can be utilized to pay for the nontuition prices of a faculty training—the expertise prices and books and childcare and transportation prices—all of which have a huge effect on derailing college students from the trail to a level.”

Libassi famous that the appliance and enrollment necessities may pose an impediment to college students and they could worry their grants might be transformed into loans. He believes it may make Excelsior much less fascinating to them.

“I believe there’s this looming query of how a lot of it’s about limitations, how a lot of it’s about college students who need the help however simply discover it too arduous to navigate the method … It’s clear that’s a part of the story,” he mentioned. “However then there’s additionally this query of whether or not college students need this sufficient.”

Judith Scott-Clayton, co-author of the report and a professor of economics and training at Academics Faculty, believes the principle lesson state coverage makers designing promise packages can take away from Excelsior’s first 5 years is to not make these packages too complicated.

“I might hope that they’d actually consider carefully concerning the penalties of being too fancy, being just a little too persnickety, with their eligibility necessities,” she mentioned. “As a result of not solely does it create the potential for low take-up and confusion and complexity for college students, it additionally creates plenty of administrative challenges for individuals who are accountable for implementing all of those guidelines.”

She added that one of many motivations behind the free school motion was “this concept that monetary help had gotten too difficult and no one knew what they had been going to must pay … When you add too many asterisks and an excessive amount of superb print, I believe it should begin to undermine the facility of the free school message,” she mentioned.


Leave a Comment